Monday, May 12, 2008

Westminster Cathedral Mass for Matrimony

Briefing: a really positive initiative, and an opportunity for Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor to make some uncompromising statements to the BBC: 'the breakdown of marriage is one of the greatest evils of our day'; if we find ourselves being 'counter-cultural', then 'so be it'; 'So many people are in prison...as the result of broken marriages. And it's a time bomb because the effects are insidious. It's starting now with divorce but its effects will go on and on.' See the BBC TV report and the website report with a short video of the Cardinal, and the Westminster Archdiocese page here.

From the BBC, in part: Some 650 couples went to mass at the Roman Catholic Westminster Cathedral on Saturday to celebrate the 43,000 years of experience of marriage they have between them.

Several first made their vows more than 60 years ago. But there was a more sombre purpose behind the event, organised by the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. He wanted to present an example of enduring marriage in order to warn of the dangers of letting it go. Marriage is at its lowest level since records began, and people are getting divorced earlier.About 40% of marriages now end in divorce, with the result that almost a quarter of children have experienced family break-up by the time they are 16.

Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor describes it as a time-bomb threatening the integrity of British society. Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor says marriage breakdown 'is one of the greatest evils' "The effects of the break up of marriage can be seen because of drugs and crime," he says. "So many people are in prison...as the result of broken marriages. And it's a time bomb because the effects are insidious. It's starting now with divorce but its effects will go on and on."

Read More...

Happy Pentecost!

Rose petals being dropped through the 'oculus' of the Roman minor basilica S. Maria ad martyres, the ancient Pantheon, in Rome, in celebration of the coming of Holy Spirit at Pentecost.

Hat-tip to Fr Z, where there are more photographs.

Read More...

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Statue of Our Lady in Chelsea: announcment

Briefing and comment: the project to establish a memorial to the burning of the great pilgrimage images of Our Lady is a laudable one. It is more than a pity, however, that the image of Our Lady which is planned will not be in the iconographic tradition of the ones destroyed but, judging from the model, in the tradition of ugly realism which is totally opposed to it. Secularism has triumphed even in this attempt to make reparation for a crime against the cult of Our Lady. See the full Catholic Herald article and an untrimmed picture here; the previous post on this project here.

From CFNews: Plans have been unveiled for a statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary to stand in London in reparation for the destruction of the medieval Catholic shrines during the Reformation. The work will be called 'Mary Most Holy' and will stand on land alongside the River Thames at Chelsea's Embankment Gardens that was once owned by St Thomas More, the Lord Chancellor who was beheaded in 1535. It has been commissioned by the Art and Reconciliation Trust, a charity set up to promote awareness of the negative affects iconoclasm can have on culture. It will cost in the region of £1.25 million.

The sculptor is Paul Day, who at unveiling a model for the sculpture at the Charterhouse in London last week, that its purpose would be 'to recall events in Chelsea's local history that were of national importance and whose effects can still be powerfully felt in present day Britain. The destruction of England's medieval shrines and devotional images, conducted by Thomas Cromwell, was part of Henry VIII's programme for reform,' he said. 'In the summer of 1538 Cromwell was ensconced at Chelsea Manor to conduct his affairs because of an outbreak of the plague in central London. From there, he ordered the most important Marian shrines in England be brought to Chelsea so that he could witness their destruction. The dissolution of the monasteries and destruction of popular pilgrimage sites heralded an end to the traditional expression of Christianity as passed down through the Middle Ages in England and Wales. 'It is therefore hoped that this sculpture may be sited on or near to the location where the foremost Marian shrines were burnt.' [Catholic Herald]

Read More...

Hybrids bill: Prayer Vigil and Mass Lobby, reminders

Prayer Vigil—Monday 12th May, 2 pm

In order to mark this Second Reading of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill in the House of Commons on Monday 12th May we will be holding a prayer vigil together with other groups.

We are expecting a counter demonstration from supporters of the Bill so it would be good to have as many people present as possible.

PLEASE COME to our prayer vigil outside Parliament, invite members of your church, Christian groups, family and friends. We will gather at 2pm on 12th May in Old Palace Yard, opposite St Stephen’s Entrance to the House of Lords, Westminster.

At Second Reading, MPs vote on the ‘principle’ of the whole Bill. This is usually a formality and then the Bill goes through to its Committee Stages, Report and Third Reading where MPs can vote on specific amendments.

With faith and humility we must come together to pray for a great miracle. Monday, 12th May is the day after Pentecost and exactly 2 years since the miraculous defeat at Second Reading of the Joffe Bill which would have legalised euthanasia in this country. We would like Christians everywhere to come in their hundreds and stand outside Parliament and pray for this miracle; pray that MPs will vote against the principle of the Bill. If such a vote is won then the Bill will be defeated right from the outset.

It is vital that MPs continue to be lobbied at this time. We must continue our campaign, contacting our MPs to secure their vote against the Bill at Second
Reading and beyond if necessary.

A key point to make at this time, is that there appears to be insufficient Parliamentary time to debate properly the huge issues at stake. Make it clear that their vote on this matter will affect how we will vote at the next General Election.

Please read our information pack on the issues in this bill. A miracle is needed to stop this Bill. We believe in the God of miracles—please pray that the Lord will intervene, delivering us from this Bill.


Mass Lobby of Parliament

Join the National Lobby of Parliament, 14th May 2008, 12.30 pm onwards This is a vital opportunity to tell your MP how strongly you feel about the introduction of the Bill. Please arrange to meet your MP in Parliament anytime from 12.30 pm onwards. Passion for Life will supply briefings to help inform your discussion. (NB Even if your MP cannot meet that day, it is vital that you still come to London to leave cards/letters and to show your support).

Refreshments, literature and an opportunity to meet pro-life MPs will all be at the Emmanuel Centre, Marsham Street (5 minutes’ walk from Parliament) from 12.30 pm until the evening.

Please don’t miss this opportunity to have your say on this vital issue. Now is the time to arrange transport, book appointments with MPs and encourage friends and colleagues to join you in travelling to London.

For further information call (020) 3176 0032, or info@passionforlife.org.


Alive and Kicking Campaign

Alive and Kicking has sent all MPs a letter, letting them know that any votes on abortion will be monitored by Alive and Kicking and published for the public to access. This information will have an impact on public voting at the next general election—especially for those MPs with marginal seats.

You can check your MP’s majority on the Alive and Kicking MPs’ database on their website. Simply click on the MPs’ database, enter your postcode, or select your MP—their majority is listed under ‘Details of MP’. The number of their majority may well be lower than the number of Christians in your constituency. Getting in contact with other churches in your area and lobbying your MP together would be a very effective way of putting pressure on your MP.

Please also continue to send your petitions to Alive and Kicking; these will be presented to 10 Downing Street in the coming weeks.

Read More...

Friday, May 09, 2008

E&W Bishops stand in way of Anglican conversions

Briefing and comment: it is not surprising that the Bishops of England and Wales do not look forward to 'high' Anglicans becoming Catholics. Not only would such converts, like many converts, in putting the final correct pieces into their picture of Christian theology, be more orthodox than most Catholics, including Catholic clergy, but fashionable liberal theology disaproves of the whole notion of conversion to Catholicism, preferring the idea that we should somehow 'converge with', not convert, people holding erroneous doctrines. Damian Thompson's comments will be based on his personal contacts with 'Anglo Catholic' clergy.

From Damian Thompson: The current hierarchy feels no more warmly towards conservative Anglo-Catholics than it does towards the Latin Mass Society. It will do the bare minimum to accommodate converts. The paradox is that many Anglo-Catholic parishes celebrate the liturgy in a manner that corresponds far more closely to Benedict's aesthetic of worship than the makeshift, sloppy services found in ordinary Catholic parishes.

No wonder the flying bishops are unhappy and confused. If they submit to Rome, they would like to do so under a truly sympathetic papacy, but who knows how long it will last? The best solution would be for the Pope to appoint a successor to Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor who is in his own image - the Dominican writer Fr Aidan Nichols, say. But the chances of that happening are slim. We are heading towards another missed opportunity

Read More...

Thomas More Legal Centre: adoption law should be challenged

Briefing.

From the Thomas More Legal Centre: The Church must take the adoption fight to the courts

Neil Addison says it will be disastrous if dioceses pull out of adoption work without a legal battle - Catholic Herald
2 May 2008
Three Catholic adoption agencies have now either closed or ceased to be "Catholic" organisations because of the impact of the Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs). The remaining ones are now also considering their future.

The dioceses which have closed their agencies made the decision because they felt they had no alternative. But a cynic might be forgiven for thinking that past enemies of the Church shouldn't have bothered with "dungeon, fire and sword" and should have relied upon statutory instruments instead.

The Church must, of course, obey the law. But I find it sad that the Church appears to be acquiescing in the most fundamentalist interpretations of the SORs when it could be questioning these interpretations and engaging in the process of deciding what the SORs really mean.

The SORs cannot be looked at in isolation. You also have to consider human rights protections for religious belief, equality legislation prohibiting religious discrimination and, finally, the Adoption Act itself, which makes the welfare of the child the primary consideration. Many questions remained unanswered. For example, is a decision by a Catholic adoption agency only to approve adoption by married heterosexual partners a "homophobic" decision? Or can it be shown objectively to be in the best interests of children? Would a refusal by a local authority to approve a Catholic adoption agency be legal under religious discrimination law? And would a requirement that a Catholic agency approves single-sex parents be a breach of religious freedom protected by Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights?

When you have such a cocktail of law and competing rights you have ample scope for legal argument, negotiation and compromise.

I do not say that the Church would win every legal challenge to its adoption agencies. But I do believe that the issue is not clear-cut. Even if the Church did not win a case outright it might well win significant points which would allow Catholic adoption agencies to continue while operating in a way which is acceptable to Church teaching.

The law in our country develops through case law and that means that individuals and organisations must be willing to challenge officialdom and official interpretations of legislation. So, when the law affects the Church, the Church must be willing to challenge the application of the law. By choosing to close its adoption agencies the Church appears to be giving up and walking away. If the Church is seen to do that, without at least arguing its case in court, then it will look as if it is unwilling to defend its own principles. That is dangerous for the future of the Catholic Church and Christian involvement in our society. The Catholic Church has been involved in child care for 2,000 years and if the Church in Britain is not prepared vigorously to defend its continued role in this area then what area of Catholic activity will be picked on next?

The Prussian military historian Carl von Clausewitz famously said that "warfare was politics by other means"; the Church must accept that in the modern world litigation has become politics by other means. Personally, I do not like this development but it is a reality. Gay rights activists achieved most of their successes through the courts, not through conventional politics. Other religions have shown a willingness to go to court where necessary to defend their activities. The Catholic Church in Britain has not generally resorted to law to defend itself because it has, in the main, operated in a benign political environment where general Christian principles were accepted and Christianity seen as part of the background culture. That benign political environment can no longer be relied upon and the Church needs to adapt its attitudes accordingly.

I am not suggesting that the Church should adopt an aggressive "I'll see you in court, I know my rights" attitude. Such an attitude would alienate people and also be profoundly unChristian. But there is a difference between being peaceful and failing to challenge where challenge is right. The danger is that, if the Church does not put up a legal fight over the SORs, it will give the appearance of meekly surrendering at the first sign of political pressure. On a more fundamental level, if the Church does not stand up on this issue it will be failing to play its full part in British society and to influence how our society develops.

"For evil to triumph all that is required is for good men to do nothing" is a cliché, but it is nevertheless true. With the great range of anti-discrimination and "hate crime" legislation which has been put into force in a relatively short period of time, we are engaged in a great social experiment: namely, to discover to what extent can a free society tell people what they cannot do or say and still remain a free society. Pope Benedict touched on this paradox in his recent encyclical Spe Salvi; he argued that, when a state tries to create a perfect society and abolish all evil, the state itself becomes the only arbiter of morality - and that way lies totalitarianism. Nobody, I think, denies that we live in a secular society where the Church is one voice among many. But what we as a society are still sorting out is what model of secular society are we to follow: that of America or that of Soviet Russia? That choice is going to be decided in the courts.

When I and others realised that many of the decisions about the place of the Church in our society would be decided in court we chose to found the Thomas More Legal Centre. The Centre provides individuals and organisations with legal advice and help to defend their right to freedom of conscience and Christian practice. We also realised that individual Catholic charities, adoption agencies and so forth, could not take on the financial risks of litigation on their own. Whether through our Centre or in some other way, Catholic charities and the Church itself need to ensure that Catholic organisations are supported collectively in defending their principles. The effect of one Catholic organisation winning or losing a case will affect all other Catholic organisations.

The Church cannot withdraw from its social activities without compromising its essential nature and being seen as irrelevant. But that means that the Church and its organisations must be willing to fight to defend their right to provide services in accordance with Catholic principles. The Church may not win, but if Catholic agencies are to be closed down and children are to be deprived of these services, let that be done, and be seen to be done, by the Government -_and not by the Church. To surrender the Catholic adoption agencies without legal challenge is unjustifiable and could have grave implications for the future of Catholic life in this country.

Neil Addison is a barrister, author of Religious Discrimination and Hatred Law and national director of the
Thomas More Legal Centre

Read More...

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Evangelium conference for young Catholics

Briefing.

From CFNews: This summer there is an Evangelium Conference for young adults (18-35), sponsored by the CTS, at Fawley Court, Henley-on-Thames from 8-10 August. Speakers include Fr John Saward, Fr Thomas Crean OP, Fr Jerome Bertram of the Oxford Oratory, and Joanna Bogle. Spaces are limited to 100 guests, so please book early. For more information or to reserve a place, call 07526 908741, or write to Evangelium, PO Box 1218, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE99 2TG

Read More...

Home abortion consultation

Briefing. When the consultation goes 'live' it should appear here.

From CFNews: A government consultation will measure demand for legal abortion performed away from clinics and hospitals in England. Ms Dawn Primarolo MP, health minister, said: 'Our priority is to reduce the time women have to wait for an abortion at what is already a very difficult time for them.' Pilot studies have already been carried out involving the provision of abortion-inducing drugs by medical facilities that were apparently not licensed to do so. Marie Stopes International, the abortion provider, welcomed the developments. [PA on Channel 4] Anthony Ozimic, SPUC political secretary, said: 'Easier access to abortion trivialises the killing of unborn children and the damage caused to mothers and society by abortion. The recent draft position statement from the Royal College of Psychiatrists confirms that women may be at risk of developing mental problems as a result of having an abortion. This reflects the findings of the 2006 Fergusson study which suggested that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.' [SPUC]

Read More...

Family Policy in the EU

Briefing.

From CFNews: On Wednesday morning, in the European Parliament, the Institute for Family Policy (IPF) presented its Report on 'The Evolution of the Family in Europe 2008' (the full report with all charts and tables can be consulted here.

This study has been carried out by a multi-disciplinary team of experts in different fields such as demography, psychology, sociology, and successful reconciliation of work and family life, and coordinated by Lola Velarde, President of the IPF European Network.

Although there is growing concern of the European Union by the family and its problems, as evidenced by the recent adopted documents such as the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee about 'The family and the demographic evolution', and the Communication of the European Commision: 'The demographic future of Europe: from challenge to opportunity', it is also true that this action is still clearly inadequate and that as a result of this, family problems have continued to get worse, says Lola Velarde.

Indeed, indicators of population, birth, marriage, family breakdowns and households have got worse in these 27 years. Data from the report on 'Evolution of the Family in Europe 2008' are eloquents and conclusives. Europe is undergoing a demographic winter and now, Europe is an elderly continent -old people over 65 exceed by more than 6 million young people under 14 years. Besides, the problem of birth has become critical as fewer children are born
(almost one million fewer births than in 1980) and there are one million abortions, that makes it -with cance r-the leading cause of mortality in Europe. Finally, there is a collapse of marriages, with fewer marriages and more marital breakdowns-1 million divorces a year- andwith empty households (2 out of 3 European households have no children). '

Some of the Report's conclusions are as follows:



I. European Demographic Winter

1. Slow growth of the European population (EU27)is basically due to immigration, that is 84% of EU27 population growth between 2000-2007.

Between 2000 and 2007, of the 14.2 million increase in population, 12 million (84% of this increase) was the result of immigration. and which has continued in 2007, with an increase of 80%. The immigrant population is already over 27 million, representing 5.5% of the population of Europe

Although Germany (7.2 million) and Spain (4.6 million) are the EU countries with the highest number of immigrants, and these two countries alone represent 42% of the total, it is Spain the country which has grown the most over the last 10 years with a growth of 701%, going from barely 500,000 in 1996 to over 4.6 million in 2006

2. Europe is an elderly continent: one out of every five inhabitants is over 65 and, besides, there are 6 million more over-65s than under-14s.

There are already 6 million more elderly individuals than young people. Whilst in 1980 there were 36 million more children than elderly individuals, by 2007 there were 6 million (5,966,400) more over-65s than under-14s.

One out of every five inhabitants is over 65. The under-14 population in the EU25 has decreased from 94 million in 1980 to only 74 million in 2007, which represents a decrease of 20 million young people. By contrast, the over-65 population in the EU25 has increased from 57 million in 1980 to 80 million in 2007, which represents an increase of almost 23 million elderly people.

Bulgaria and Germany are the EU27 countries with the fewest young people. In these countries, only 1 out of every 8 inhabitants is under 14.Besides, Italy and Germany are the countries with the largest elderly populations, significantly higher than the European mean figure. One out of every 5 inhabitants is over 65.



II. Critical Birthrate

3. There are almost a million fewer babies born annually than in 1980. In 2007, almost one million (920,089) fewer babies were born in the EU27 than in 1982, which represents a decrease of 15%. Over this period (1982-2007) the population has increased by almost 37 million.

With birth rate in some countries at a critical level. Slovakia (1.24), Poland (1.27), Romania (1.31) and Germany (1.32), etc. barely reach a birth rate of 1.3.

4. And with 1.200.000 abortions a year, one abortion each 27 seconds...In Europe (EU-27) there is one abortion every 27 seconds, equal to almost one million two hundred thousand abortions annually (1,167,775) (2006), which means that abortion is the main cause of death in Europe. Spain is the country with the highest increase in number of abortions over the last 10 years (1996-2006) with an increase of 99%.

One of every five pregnancies (18.5%) is ended by abortion.Of the 6,390,014 pregnancies in 2006 in the EU27, 1,167,683 were ended by abortion, equal to 18.5% of pregnancies.

Each year in Europe, abortion figures are the equivalent of the populations of Luxembourg and Malta combined, or the entire population of Slovenia or Cyprus.

France (206,311), United Kingdom (194,353), Romania (150,246), Italy (129,272), Germany (119,710) and Spain (101,592) are the EU27 countries with the highest abortion rates, and accounted for 77% of all abortions.

Spain is the country with the highest increase in number of abortions over the last 10 years (1996-2006) with an increase of 99%.

5. People start families later in life, at almost 30 years (EU25).

Average age at maternity has increased by 2.6 years. Age at maternity has increased by 2.6 years in the EU25 in recent years, going from 27.1 in 1980 to almost 30 (29.7) in 2006. Spanish women (30.88 years old) are, along with Italian women (30.8) and Dutch women (30.58), the EU27 females who have their first child latest.



III. Dramatic fall in marriage rate in Europe

6. Dramatic fall in marriage rate in Europe. 737,752 fewer marriages than in 1980. Over 26 years (1980-2006), the number of marriages in the EU27 has decreased by more than 737,000, equivalent to 23.9%. In spite of a population increase of 36 million (1980-2006). The marriage rate has dropped from 6.75 in 1980 to 4.85 in 2006. In countries such as Bulgaria, Slovenia or Hungary, the fall in marriage rate has been around 50%, i.e. For every 2 marriages that took place in 1980, now there is only 1.

7. People are starting families later. Women at an average age of around 29, men over 31. In the space of barely 25 years, Europeans have delayed by more than 5 years the age at which they start a family (5.5 years for women and 5.2 years for men), men being over 31 and women approaching 29.

8. One out of every 3 children (33.9 %) is born outside marriage in the EU27. This affects more than 1.7 million children each year. Of the 5,209,942 births in the EU27 in 2006, 1,766,733 were born to unmarried parents. This represents 33.9% of births. Estonia (58.24%), Sweden (55.47%), Bulgaria (50.79%) and France (50.49%) are the countries where there are more births outside marriage than within it.

France, with 419,192 births, is the country with the highest number of births outside marriage, followed by the United Kingdom with 326,792. These two countries alone account for 42% of the total.

9. There are over one million divorces and 365,000 more divorces than in 1980. Marital breakdown has increased by 369,365 in 26 years (1980-2006), an increase of 55%. Spain, with an increase of 290%, is the EU country with the highest increase in marital breakdown over the last 10 years (1996-2006).

Belgium, Luxembourg and Spain are the EU27 countries with the highest rate of marital breakdown. For every three marriages entered into, two end in divorce. Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Spain are the EU27 countries with the highestnumber of divorces. The number of divorces in these countries is over 605,000 and accountfor 58% of the total.

Over 10.1 million marital breakdowns in 10 years (1996-2006) in the EU27 that have affected over 15 million children.

10. Marriages last an average of 13 years before breaking down. Italy, 16.8 years, is the EU-27 country where marriages last longest before breaking down. It is followed by Spain (13.9 years) and Slovenia (13.7 years). By contrast, Austria with 10.6 years is the EU-27 country where marriage lasts the least before breaking down.



IV. Empty households

11. The size of European households is decreasing. Only 2.4 members per household. In barely 25 years (1980-2005), the average size of households has decreased by 'losing' 1.5 persons. It has gone from almost 3 persons (2.82) to 2.4 members per household. Malta (3.2), Cyprus (3.1), Romania (2.9) and Spain (2.9) are the countries with the highest number of members per household. By contrast, Germany (2.1), Denmark (2.1), Finland
(2.1), and Sweden (2.2) are the countries with the lowest number of members perhousehold.

12. European households are becoming more solitary. 1 out of every 4 households in Europe has a single dweller…27.7% of European households have only 1 person. And now more than 54 million Europeans live alone.



V. Insufficient family policies

13. Although there is growing awareness of the problems faced by families in the European Union, there is no organisation which is in charge of Family Policy, nor does it have a Family Observatory, or a Green Paper on the Family. Although there are 5 Vice-presidencies and 21 Committees within the European Commission, none of them covers the Family, being dealt with by the Committee on Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.

The Observatory on Family Policies was created in 1989 and closed in 2004, when it was replaced by the Observatory on Demography and the Social Situation. Besides, of the 95 Green Papers written since 1984, none has been on the Family.

14. European countries start to have family organizations at first level....While European countries like Germany, Fance, Ireland, Norway, Hungary, Luxemburg, Slovenia, Belgium, Slovaquia, etc, have Ministeries of Family...

15. But with little budget: Of every 13 euros Europe sets aside for Social Expenditure, only 1 euro is set aside for the Family …Europe sets aside, on average, on Social Expenditure is 28% of GDP, with significant differences between countries: Sweden sets aside 32% of GDP, (more than two and a half times Estonia and Latvia, which set aside only around 12.5% of GDP for Social Expenditure).

Since 1996, the average set aside by Europe for the Family has remained static at 2.2%, which represents only 7.7% of Social Expenditure.

16. With significant differences between countries..Whilst some countries target families as a priority for assistance, providing levels far higher than the European average.

Denmark, Luxembourg, Germany, Sweden, Finland and Austria set aside above 3% of GDP for the Family, 40% more than the European average (2.1% of GDP). Denmark (3.8% GDP) and Luxembourg (3.6% GDP) are the EU27 countries that offer most assistance to families Other countries do not prioritise families for assistance. Poland, Malta, Spain, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Italy, and Portugal set aside less than 1.2% of GDP for the Family, which is far below the European average (2.1% of GDP).

17. Leading to significant differences for families in each country...A family with two children, without income-related restrictions, would receive 471€/month in Luxembourg, in Germany 308€/month, in Ireland 300€/month and in Belgium 274€/month etc. By contrast, the same family in Poland would receive 32 €/month (and with strict incomerelated restrictions), 25 €/month in Latvia and 23 €/month in Bulgaria (and with strict incomerelated
restrictions).

In 2007, countries such as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania made efforts to increase benefits per child by more than 25%, whilst the average increase considered was 2.6% for 1st and 2nd child.

18. There is a clear correlation between direct assistance to families and the number of children: Countries which offer higher family benefit levels have higher birth rates France, Ireland and Luxembourg give significant child benefits and have a high number of chilfren. By contrast, Spain, Poland and Italy have few children and very low levels of child benefits.



VI. IPF proposals

What is required is the instigation in Europe of the development of 'family-oriented' government policies and the implementation of genuine, effective, comprehensive and universal Family Policies.

Built around the following axis:

o Giving the Family status as a policy priority

o Making the 'Family-oriented' approach an integral part of all measures put in place bythe European Union

o Recognise and promote family rights in all areas, particularly the priority of child care and education.

o Promoting convergence between national family policies to avoid differences between countries

o Pushing for equality of opportunity for all European families, to avoid discrimination based on number of children, income levels, income distribution, etc.

And doing so by means of…

o Appropriate bodies

o Budgetary provision

o Plans, measures and legislation

Following action plans that…

o Promote the Family as an institution,

o Encourage a universal concept of the Family and also a culture and environment that allows the Family to manage its day-to-day existence,

o Help parents to have the children they want,

o Include, in a genuinely constructive and humane fashion, the different areas of professional, family and personal development,

o Provide assistance during cases of family crisis,

o Recognise the fundamental right of parents to educate their children,

o Promote the active participation of parents and family associations

o And, through specific measures, take account of families with particular needs.

I. Which promote the Family as an institution…

1. By creating the Commission for the Family to promote the Family as a policy priority in European Union countries, and to ensure that all European legislation considers the Family as a social base with rights and roles that must be respected and promoted.

2. By urging EU member states to set up a Ministry for the Family with sufficient organisational and budgetary capacity to develop Family promotion and protection measures in Europe.

3. By drafting a Green Paper on the Family in Europe which analyses the problems faced by the Family along with their causes and consequence, and sets out solutions and alternatives

4. By promoting a European Agreement on the Family between political parties, social agents and family institutions.

II. Which promotes a Family-oriented culture, disseminating a universal concept of the Family and encouraging an environment which favours it...

5. By re-establishing the Family Policy Observatory, with social involvement, to analyse the situation and development of the Family in Europe and to advise on, manage and oversee policy measures affecting it, and to ensure that public policy measures are drawn up to take account of the Family.

6. By running campaigns to increase awareness within society and to promote an environment and culture that favours the Family, placing value on childhood and maternity.

7. By incorporating into European Directives on communication media the criteria of respect for and promotion of the Family, in addition to the creation of Independent Audiovisual Councils one of whose objectives is the protection of minors and the Family.

III. Which assist families in the management of their day-to-day existence, helping parents to have the children they want...

8. By promoting the establishment of gradual convergence between family protection measures in different European countries, so that:

o 2.5% GDP: In 5 years time, all countries are setting aside a minimum of 2.5% of GDP for social spending on the family.

o Making assistance universal: In 5 years time, all countries are promoting universal family assistance practices or at least, as the first step towards achieving this, are establishing limits (per capita) which include 90% of families.

o 125€/month: Co-financing benefits per dependent child, providing benefits are universal, contributing 30% of the amount corresponding to the State in question, up to a maximum of 125€/month.

o Making benefits tax-exempt: Countries establish tax convergence objectives for tax exemption on family benefits.

o Benefits linked to annual inflation rate: Countries put in place measures ensuring that family benefits increase in line with inflation.

IV. Which assist families in the management of their day-to-day existence, helping parents to have the children they want......

9. By urging governments to adopt a more equal distribution of benefits aimed at the Family - currently accounting for 8% of total social benefits - gradually increasing their amount.

10. By adopting measures of support for pregnancy and maternity

o Reducing by 50% the VAT payable on a series of essential infant products (baby hygiene items such as nappies, soap, moisturising creams, wet wipes, feeding products such as formula milk, containers and feeding bottles, cereal and food preparations and baby furniture items such as cots, chairs and prams, baby carriers, car seats etc.).

o Setting up Care Centres for Pregnant Women to help for all mothers, married or single, with their pregnancies, with particular attention for immigrant mothers.

11. By increasing tax convergence in Europe to make it Family-oriented

V. Which include, in a genuinely constructive and humane fashion, the different areas of professional, family and personal development…

12. In all European Union countries, promoting and encouraging maternity leave of 23 weeks with 100% salary, and paternity leave of 6 weeks with the same conditions as maternity leave.

13.Ensuring parents' right to choose.

o Promoting extension of benefits for fathers/mothers who request extended leave to look after their children.

o Enlarging the network of nurseries for the 0-3 age group.

14. By insisting on universal assistance for families caring for elderly relatives in their home

15.Promoting the adoption of rational working days by companies to allow professional and family life to be combined.

VI. That help overcome family crises...

16. By insisting on preventive measures to assist in cases of family crisis (following Council of Europe recommendations) to reduce instances of family breakdown in Europe.

o Updating and modernisation of Council of Europe recommendations (1974-1980).

o Promoting Family Guidance Centres, both public and private.

o Urging EU countries to draw up a Law for Preventive Measures and Family Mediation.

o Carrying out studies, analyses and surveys to discover the causes of family breakdown and introducing measures whose aim is to reduce and/or alleviate their negative consequences.

VII. Which recognise the right of parents to educate their children...
.
17. By recognising Education as a Fundamental Family Right (not as a public service)

o Making the education costs met by families (text books, schools etc.) income taxdeductible.

o Increasing the number of parent representatives on School Councils.

o Promoting the right of parents to choose their children's education, promoting directives on the school-cheque, and assisting States that implement it (up to 25% of the cost).

VIII. And promoting the active involvement of families and family associations... creating Internet Portal 'InfoFamilias' with information on services for European families. [IPF]

Read More...

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Statue of Our Lady in Chelsea: confirmation

Briefing; Hat-tip to Catholic Rights, though we can't find the original story in Independent Catholic News. See our orginal post here.

From Catholic Rights: You may remember a couple of months back permission was being sought for the placing of a Statue of Our Lady at Chelsea Manor. The Manor was the former home of St Thomas More and was taken over by Thomas Cromwell who at that spot having brought statues of Our Lady from all over England smashed them up, lit a great bonfire and had the ashes thrown into the Thames. This will be a statue of Reparatin. The Virgin and Child wll be at the centre and on one side images of the crucifix being mocked and on the other the smashing of the images. The work is being crried out by the renowned artist Paul Day.

Read More...

Monday, May 05, 2008

Graglia against Feminism: 9

A continuing series; see here for the introduction, and here for more on feminism in the Catholic Church in the UK.

From Domestic Tranquility, p146
It is because society has accepted this stereotype of the housewife as a cultural truth that Professor Carolyn Heilbrun can go virtually unchallenged when she asserts that the woman who devotes herself to domesticity lacks "selfhood", since she fails to act "in the public domain" and exists, instead, as a "female impersonator", simply "fulfilling the needs of others". ... Why, one must wonder, are feminists convinced that fulfilling the market demands of strangers is so much worthier an endevor than attending to the needs of one's own family? Is it really too late to challenge this conviction? A challenge seems necessary because a life that requires the constriction of marital and maternal relationships in favor of a materialist pursuit of career achievement bears a remarkable resemblance to the pornographer's world of sex without emotions. This is the sexual world that the feminist revolution also embraced.

Read More...

Sunday, May 04, 2008

The Forty Martyrs

Today (4th May) is the feast of the Forty Martyrs. These forty are representative of the much larger number of Catholics executed, tortured to death, or dying in prison, for the Faith in the 16th and 17th Centuries. The Forty were canonised in 1970 by Pope Paul VI; many others are 'beati' and 'venerabili', and more are known only to God.

The Forty Martyrs

Saint Alban Roe
Saint Alexander Briant
Saint Ambrose Barlow
Saint Anne Line
Saint Augustine Webster
Saint Cuthbert Mayne
Saint David Lewis
Saint Edmund Arrowsmith
Saint Edmund Campion
Saint Edmund Gennings,
Saint Eustace White
Saint Henry Morse
Saint Henry Walpole
Saint John Almond
Saint John Boste
Saint John Houghton
Saint John Jones
Saint John Kemble
Saint John Lloyd
Saint John Paine
Saint John Plessington
Saint John Rigby
Saint John Roberts
Saint John Southworth
Saint John Stone
Saint John Wall
Saint Luke Kirby
Saint Margaret Clitherow
Saint Margaret Ward
Saint Nicholas Owen
Saint Philip Evans
Saint Philip Howard
Saint Polydore Plasden
Saint Ralph Sherwin
Saint Richard Gwyn
Saint Richard Reynolds
Saint Robert Lawrence
Saint Robert Southwell
Saint Swithun Wells
Saint Thomas Garnet

Ora pro nobis!

Read More...

BBC shows explicit films to children

Briefing.

From CFnews: BBC programmes are subject to the post 9pm watershed ruling when they are shown on terrestrial television. But children are able to bypass age restrictions on BBC iPlayer by simply ticking a box to say they are over 16. They can then watch programmes with sexually- explicit content, extreme swearing and other unsuitable material. For example, the BBC3 programme Sex... With Mum and Dad, usually broadcast after the watershed but available on the iPlayer 24 hours a day, features a teenager asking his mother about sexual acts. Another BBC3 show, Page Three Teens, offers repeated shots of topless models in sexually suggestive poses. A similar programme, Glamour Girls, is also on offer.

While the readily available explicit content on the internet is nothing new, many are horrified the BBC is not taking a tougher stand. Critics fear that it is in danger of rendering the watershed extinct with the iPlayer service. Others have called for media regulator Ofcom to be given more powers in overseeing the way online programming is aired. Conservative MP Philip Davies, who sits on the Commons culture, media and sport select committee, said: 'I think parents would be massively concerned if they realised how easy it was for their children to access such inappropriate material. 'Having that kind of tick-box self- certification is clearly inadequate. They may as well have no control on at all.'

John Beyer, director of the pressure group Mediawatch UK, said: 'The BBC is promoting its iPlayer at every possible opportunity and they know that children and young people are accessing this kind of material.'

A corporation spokesman said, however: 'The BBC takes its responsibility to enable parents or guardians to protect younger viewers from unsuitable BBC content on its websites very seriously and provides a number of tools to do this. 'For example, BBC iPlayer clearly labels programmes which may be unsuitable for young audiences. A lock system allows parents or guardians to prevent younger viewers from watching guidance-rated programmes unless they have a password. Setting up these systems is optional but they can be easily activated at any time.' [Daily Mail]

Read More...

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Good Friday 'Reproaches' 'antisemitic' says Guardian

Briefing and comment. The Guardian's George Hall, reviewing St John Passion, a new composition by James MacMillan, criticises his use of the Reproaches (Improperia) from the Good Friday liturgy, as antisemitic. As Damian Thompson comments, it is impossible to avoid the fact that Christians think Jesus was the Messiah, and that his own people rejected Him. It is absurd to suggest that Christians can't make reference to this rejection without being called antisemitic. The casual way in which Hall makes this appalling accusation is, alas, typical of the liberal attack on Christianity.

The Reproaches expand the idea of Micah 6.3ff: O my people, what have I done unto thee? and wherein have I wearied thee? testify against me. This is an accusation against the Jewish people: is it antisemitic? In fact, the faithful listening to the Reproaches naturally apply the accusation to themselves, placing themselves in the position of the Jews who rejected Jesus, since as sinners they know they have rejected Him by sinning. This idea was reflected in Mel Gibson himself holding the nail driven into Christ's hand in his filming of the The Passion.

Read More...

Friday, May 02, 2008

Prayer vigil outside Parliement for hybrids bill

Action: please support this if you can: 2 pm on 12th May in Old Palace Yard, outside Parliament--as with the National Lobby of Parliament, 14th May 12.30 onwards.

From Christian Concern for our Nation: The Second Reading of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill in the House of Commons will take place on Monday, 12th May.

At Second Reading MPs vote on the ‘principle’ of the whole Bill. This is usually a formality and then the Bill goes through to its Committee Stages, Report and Third Reading where MPs can vote on specific amendments.

With faith and humility we must come together to pray for a great miracle. The 12th May is the day after Pentecost and exactly 2 years since the miraculous defeat at Second Reading of the Joffe Bill which would have legalised euthanasia in this country. [Euthanasia in some cases was in fact legalised by the Mental Capacity Act. Webmaster.] We would like Christians everywhere to come in their hundreds and stand outside Parliament and pray for this miracle; pray that MPs will vote against the principle of the Bill. If such a vote is won then the Bill will be defeated right from the onset.

PLEASE COME to our prayer vigil outside Parliament, invite members of your church, Christian groups, family and friends. The Plan is to gather at 2 pm on 12th May in Old Palace Yard, opposite St Stephen’s Entrance to the House of Lords, Westminster.

It is vital that MPs continue to be lobbied at this time. We must continue our campaign, contacting our MPs to secure their vote against the Bill at Second Reading and beyond if necessary. A key point to make at this time is that there appears to be insufficient Parliamentary time to debate properly the huge issues at stake. Make it clear that their vote on this matter will affect how we will vote at the next General Election.

A miracle is needed to stop this Bill. We believe in the God of miracles – please pray that the Lord will intervene, delivering us from this Bill and that righteous laws will be upheld in our land.

Read More...

E&W Bishops move against Holydays: again

Update: the liturgical expert Alcuin Reid has pointed out in the Catholic Herald the Bishops have not legally promulgated the change. This is not done simply by putting an announcement on a website. H-T to Fr Z, where the article is given in full.

Briefing (30/04/08).
The campaign against the Bishops' decision, without consultation, to move the Holydays of Obligation Epiphany, Ascension and Corpus Christi to the nearest Sunday, was one of the first this blog was involved in (see here). It seemed, after that, that people wanting to celebrate those feasts on the traditional days would only be able to do so by attending the Traditional Mass, which followed the 1962 calender. Though no one disputed the bishops' power to remove the obligation to attend Mass from those days (as they have with nearly all of the 10 Holydays of Obligation recommended in canon law), the bishops made no reference to the 1962 calender and no provision for it.

Now, apparently stung by the number of people going to the Traditional Mass on the old Holydays, the bishops are trying to insist that Traditional Masses for the feasts be celebrated on the nearest Sundays too. This appears to be motivated purely by vindictiveness. There are plenty of divergences between the 1962 calender and the modern one (many saints' days; Christ the King; Septuagesima) and the bishops have expressed no interest in any of these. It is just where the opportunity to attend these feasts exposes the unpopularity of their initiative in abolishing them two years ago, that they want to intervene.

The bishops' lack of interest in the 1962 calender is demonstrated further in that they have issued no rules dealing with the implications of this move: about the Octaves, for example. It is both rude and pretty fishy that they have not made public their 'dubium' submitted to Rome or Rome's response, instead summarising the point they wish to make on their website. We will have to await proper clarification. In the meantime, even on the bishops' own claims, it will normally be possible to celebrate Mass of the feast on the original day as a votive Mass in either the 'Traditional' or the 'Novus Ordo' forms.

H/t to Fr Finnigan, Damian Thompson, and Fr Z.

Read More...

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Job Centres advertise for the sex trade

Briefing.

From CFNews: Women and girls may be lured into prostitution by adverts placed in Jobcentres, MPs were warned today. A charity which helps females rescued from the sex trade said the Government was acting as a 'pimp' by accepting ads for strippers, escort girls, lap dancers and adult show hostesses. Director of the Poppy Project, Denise Marshall, told the Commons' Home Affairs Select Committee: 'We have had contact with two 17-year-olds who have gone into the Jobcentre and it brought up a number of vacancies. 'Their mother and older sister contacted us because they were so distressed that this had happened. '

The computer system in the labour exchanges does not ask applicants to confirm their age, she added. 'Because no-one is monitoring it, you don't know who is using it. 'And when you are offering £20 an hour to be a webcam stripper to a 17-year-old, the chances are they may be naive,' she said. Outside the hearing, Ms Marshall said: 'It's the Government as pimp. It's just dreadful. 'I'm appalled that the Government is giving women entree into the commercial sex industry. ' Ms Marshall said she was not aware of any examples of women becoming involved in prostitution as a result of the vacancies being advertised in Jobcentres. 'It hasn't happened yet, but it will,' she said. 'The jobs included stripper, webcam stripper, adult show hostess, lap dancing and work with an escort agency. ' A member of staff from the Poppy Project had accessed the adverts in a number of Jobcentres around London, she said, despite the organisation's protests to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which runs the network.

News of the explicit job ads first emerged last year. The DWP insisted that it was legally obliged to carry the vacancies after a test case brought by the Ann Summer sex shop chain in 2003. A High Court judge ruled that Jobcentres must carry advertisements for legal work in the 'sex and personal-services industries'. [Daily Mail]

Read More...

Abortions for 12-yr olds

Briefing.

From CFNews: The Sunday Times has revealed that between ten and fifteen twelve year-old girls in Britain have abortions every year. The Times acquired the numbers from a reluctant Department of Health only after an appeal through freedom of information legislation and an order from the information commissioner. The documents also showed that in 2004, 142 thirteen-year-old girls had abortions, up from 138 in 2003. The Times reports that the government refused for three years to release the numbers.

The response from abortion advocates, however, has been that the number of girls is 'tiny' and that the British people simply need to accept the fact that children are having sex and becoming pregnant and that abortion continues to be the best solution. The Times quotes Ann Furedi, chief executive of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, which runs a chain of abortion clinics, who said, 'Children grow up very quickly in our society. They are maturing faster physically, psychologically and socially, and society just has to come to terms with that. Both parents and teachers need to be able to provide them with the sex education information they need.'

Furedi's comments follow closely on her assertion earlier this month that the nearly 200,000 abortions committed in Britain in 2006 were 'not a problem'. This weekend Britain's newspapers and broadcast news carried the story of Britain's new thirty-something generation of grandmothers, women who had children in their teens and whose daughters have now grown up to do the same. Since the inception of the Labour government's policies on sex education in schools and ever-increasing state support for single mothers, the teen pregnancy rate has soared to be the highest in Europe.

Meanwhile the government continues to recommend still more 'Sex and Relationship Education' (SRE), be offered to ever younger British school children, while admitting that there has been no research guiding the policies. The Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) said in a media release, 'Evidence shows that quality SRE has a direct impact on reducing teenage pregnancy rates and is an essential strand of the Government's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy. ' The DCSF asserts that SRE 'delivery is still patchy. We know that many young people feel they are not getting sex and relationship education which provides them with the knowledge and skills they need to make safe and well-informed choices. '

The government's assertion of 'evidence' that SRE reduces teenage pregnancy, however, is difficult to confirm since Jim Knight, the Minister of State for Schools and Learners admitted that the Department for Children, Schools and Families has never commissioned any research studies on the subject. Knight told the House of Commons in February, 'The Department has not commissioned research on the impact of SRE on the attitudes and lifestyle choices of young people. ' Nevertheless, despite the lack of evidence that their methods work to reduce teenage pregnancy rates, Knight maintained that the Department has 'given a commitment to review best practice in effective SRE and how it is delivered in schools. '

He would say only that the Department has 'listened to young people' who, he said, 'feel that they do not currently have the knowledge they need to make safe and responsible choices about relationships and sexual health'. On March 25, when asked what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of SRE, Knight again told the House of Commons that, despite its 'commitment to review best practice' the Department still had no idea what exactly that may entail. Knight said 'The Department has not made an assessment of the effectiveness of sex education in England. ' He repeated the Departmental slogan that they have 'given a commitment to review best practice in effective sex and relationship (SRE) and how it is delivered in schools. We have listened to young people and recognise that many feel that they do not currently have the knowledge they need to make safe and responsible choices about relationships and sexual health. '

In early April, the Department of Children, Families and Schools issued a tart statement saying it did not agree with the assessment of Mr. Justice Coleridge, a Family Division judge for England and Wales, who said that the 'epidemic' of 'family failure', and in general the government's approach to young people, sex and marriage, have been a disaster for Britain. In a speech in Brighton to lawyers from the group Resolution, the judge said in his practice he had been witness to a 'never ending carnival of human misery - a ceaseless river of human distress' in the form of broken families and that almost all of British society's social ills can be traced directly to the collapse of the family life. 'We are experiencing a period of family meltdown whose effects will be as catastrophic as the meltdown of the ice caps,' said Coleridge. He said the scale of the collapse is such that it would have been unimaginable even 10 years ago, when Tony Blair's 'New Labour' took power. [LifeSiteNews]

Read More...

Steel calls for abortion on demand

Briefing. NB this is not the time to be hoping for a reduction in the upper time limit of abortion. This is the kind of concession which pro-abortions will want as a quid pro quo: Steel himself ambiguously suggested a reduction on the upper time-limit back in 2004.

From CFNews: The law may be changed to allow 'abortion on request' by ending the need for doctors to give permission for a termination, it has been disclosed. The change is being backed by Lord Steel, the architect of Britain's abortion laws, who has called for a more liberal regime to bring Britain into line with many Continental nations. Under the existing Abortion Act, drawn up in 1967, a termination can take place only after two doctors formally agree that the procedure is medically necessary.

That requirement may become the subject of a Commons vote next month when MPs debate the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, which could be used to amend Lord Steel's 1967 Abortion Act. Lord Steel said he would like his Abortion Act to be changed to end the requirement for two doctors to give permission for a termination during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. The former Liberal Party leader said the change would create a regime of 'abortion on request. Other countries, our neighbours, have overtaken us,' he said. 'Most of our European neighbours allow a woman's right to chose up to the first trimester - not abortion on demand but abortion on request. ' Lord Steel was speaking as he outlined his opposition to attempts by pro-life MPs to use the embryology Bill to reduce the legal time limit on abortion from 24 weeks. The Bill has now left the Lords.

For the two-doctors rule to be removed, MPs would have to put forward an amendment in the Commons next month. Evan Harris, a Liberal Democrat MP who is leading the parliamentary pro-choice campaign in the Commons, said such an amendment was 'not ruled out'. But he said he hoped the Government would propose the changes. Dr Harris is a member of the Commons Science and Technology Committee, which last year concluded that the requirement for medical consent to abortion should be removed. 'The argument being, it isn't different from any other treatment,' Dr Harris said, suggesting that the two-doctor requirement can be a 'barrier' which means abortions take place later in pregnancy.

Dr Harris and other pro-choice MPs say the law should be informed by the views of the medical profession, which is pressing for an end to the two-doctor rule. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists last year told the science committee inquiry into abortion that the legal requirement for two signatures in the first three months of pregnancy was 'anachronistic' and should be scrapped. The British Medical Association also wants abortion to be available in the first three months on the basis of 'informed consent. ' MPs on all sides expect heated clashes next month in the Commons, which has not voted on abortion time limits for nearly 20 years

Read More...

Apostasy in the Royal Family

Action: prayers, please.

From CFNews: Your prayers, please, for Autumn Kelly, 29, who according to news reports has decided to apostatise in order that after her May 17th marriage to the Queen's eldest grandson, Peter Phillips, he will not have to surrender his place in succession to the Throne under the Act of Settlement of 1701. This sad news comes within a week of the forthcoming Feast of the Martyrs of England and Wales.

Read More...

Pope Leo XIII's Prayer to St Michael

Holy Michael, Archangel, defend us in the day of battle. Be our safeguard against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, Prince of the Heavenly Host, by the power of God, thrust down to Hell Satan, and all wicked spirits who wander through the world for the ruin of souls. Amen